BIENVENUE SUR MON BLOGUE-WELCOME TO MY BLOG

THIS BLOG's GOAL IS TO OBJECTIVELY INFORM.EVERYONE IS WELCOME TO COMMENT

CE BLOGUE A POUR BUT D'INFORMER DE MANIÈRE OBJECTIVE

E. do REGO

IL EXISTE MILLE MANIERES DE MENTIR, MAIS UNE SEULE DE DIRE LA VERITE.

Le Mensonge peut courir un an, la vérité le rattrape en un jour, dit le sage Haoussa .

Tant que les lions n’auront pas leurs propres historiens, les histoires de chasse continueront de glorifier le chasseur.










Showing posts with label Immigration Reform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Immigration Reform. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Key provisions in 'Gang of Eight' Senate proposal on immigration


Path to Citizenship

Most of the 11 million people who are in the country illegally could apply for a green card after 10 years and citizenship three years after that.
Applicants must pay a $1,000 fine, pay back taxes, learn English, remain employed and pass a criminal background check.
Immigrants must have arrived in the United States before Jan. 1, 2012, to be eligible.
Dream Act youth can obtain green cards in five years and citizenship immediately thereafter.

Border Control

The Department of Homeland Security will receive $3 billion to improve border security through surveillance drones and 3,500 additional customs agents; $1.5 billion for fencing.
Within five years, DHS must achieve 100 percent surveillance of the southwest border with Mexico and apprehend 90 percent of people trying to cross illegally in high-risk sectors (areas where more than 30,000 people are apprehended annually).
If DHS does not meet the metrics, a border commission composed of governors and attorneys general from border states would be given five more years and additional funding to implement more stringent measures.
The government must implement an exit/entry tracking system at ports of entry to determine whether foreign visitors or workers overstay their visas.

H-1B high-skilled visas

Visas for highly skilled engineers and computer programs would double from 65,000 to 110,000. In future years, the cap could rise to as much as 180,000.
Require employers with large numbers of H-1B visas to pay higher salaries and fees.

Guest worker “W-visa” program

New visa program for 20,000 foreigners in low-skilled jobs starting in 2015. Number of visas increases to 75,000 in 2019.
New federal bureau to analyze employment data to make recommendations for annual guest-worker visas caps beginning in 2020, to exceed no more than 200,000 annually.
Construction companies limited to no more than 15,000 visas per year.
“Safety-valve” to allow additional visas over the annual cap provided employers pay workers higher wages.

Farm worker H-2A program

Visas for agriculture workers limited to 337,000 over three years
Wages based on survey of labor-market data for various farming jobs.

Changes to family visa program

Eighteen months after the law takes effect, eliminates visas reserved for foreign brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens, and married children over 30 years of age.
Eliminates diversity visa program starting in 2015. Creates new merit-based visa category using point system based on family ties and work skills.

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Senators to release immigration plan, including a path to citizenship


By Updated: Tuesday, April 16, 12:01 AM

Millions of immigrants living illegally in the United States could earn a chance at citizenship under a sweeping Senate proposal to be released Tuesday that would represent the most ambitious overhaul of the nation’s immigration system in three decades.
The highly anticipated proposal from an eight-member bipartisan group also aims to stem the flow of undocumented immigrants into the country by creating tens of thousands of new visas for foreign workers in low-skilled jobs, according to a 17-page summary of the bill obtained by The Washington Post.
In addition, billions of dollars would be invested in new border-control measures, including surveillance drones, security fencing and 3,500 additional federal agents charged with apprehending people attempting to enter illegally from Mexico.
The legislation — marking the first comprehensive effort since a 2007 plan died in the Senate — is intended to largely solve the problem of illegal immigration while clearing a backlog of millions of foreigners trying to enter the country through legal channels.
The senators declined to discuss the details of the bill, but members of the group briefed colleagues in both congressional chambers Monday night, including the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, aides said. The group had planned to unveil its proposal at a high-profile Tuesday news conference, but that event was canceled in light of the deadly bombings at the Boston Marathon, legislative aides said late Monday.
At the White House, the Obama administration reacted positively to the news that the group had a deal. President Obama, who won 71 percent of the Latino vote last fall, has made immigration reform his top second-term priority.
“The president is very pleased with the progress we’ve seen thus far,” press secretary Jay Carney said. “We will evaluate the legislation when we get the final language. But what we have seen is a remarkable, in Washington, level of consensus between and support for bipartisan and comprehensive immigration reform. . . . And we remain cautiously optimistic that this progress will lead to legislation that can pass and the president can sign.”
Two members of the group, Sens. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.), will meet with Obama on Tuesday to discuss the bill, said a person familiar with the schedule.
The Senate Judiciary Committee has scheduled hearings Friday and Monday on the bill, which is hundreds of pages long. Opponents of a deal have denounced portions of the plan, and some senators are expected to offer a flurry of amendments designed to upset the fragile balance of the agreement. Similar tactics helped doom the 2007 effort.
“This is legislation that rivals in impact the health-care legislation,” Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), a leading critic of the reform effort, said in an interview Monday. “It needs careful scrutiny. Having a hearing Friday and Monday when most members of the Senate aren’t even here is proof that they desire no real public airing on the issues. That’s very unacceptable.”
Each provision in the legislation was rigorously negotiated in two dozen private meetings with the senators, but it is the path to citizenship that is likely to cause the most vigorous public debate.
Many Republicans oppose such a plan, saying it rewards lawbreakers by granting them amnesty. But advocates say most undocumented immigrants live in fear of deportation despite being otherwise lawful residents who came seeking employment or to be reunited with their families.
The Senate bill would allow most undocumented immigrants who arrived in the country before Dec. 31, 2011, to immediately gain “registered provisional” status after paying a $500 fine and back taxes, provided they have not committed a felony or three misdemeanors.
They could then apply for permanent resident status in 10 years after paying additional fees. Three years later, they could apply for citizenship, according to the plan summary. The fastest path to full citizenship would take 13 years, according to the legislation, but it could take longer in some cases, Senate staffers said.
The path would be easier for “Dreamers” — people brought to the country illegally by their parents at a young age — who would be able to apply for a green card in five years and citizenship immediately thereafter. Foreign farmworkers would have a similar path to help patch a shortage of such workers in the country.
“We’re in the fifth year of very high unemployment,” said Roy Beck, chief executive of Numbers­USA, a group that advocates for lower immigration. “We’re in a terrible situation for American workers. People at the lower levels have seen real wages decline. Given that backdrop, why would you grant people amnesty?”
The senators say the bill will require the government to implement strict new border-control measures — including up to $7 billion in new surveillance drones, fencing, border guards and workplace tracking systems — before the undocumented immigrants are granted green cards. The bill stipulates that the government must surveil 100 percent of the border and apprehend 90 percent of the people trying to enter illegally in high-risk sectors.
“Amnesty is the forgiveness of something. In fact, there will be consequences for having violated the law, the type of consequences that ensure that there’s no incentive to do it this way again,” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a member of the bipartisan group, said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday.
Obama has said he will not support a path to citizenship that is tied to specific “triggers” on border control. Asked whether the president could accept the border-control principles in the Senate group’s proposal, Carney responded: “I think that while we have not seen final language on the legislation that the Gang of Eight will be putting forward, as we understand it, it is consistent with the president’s position.”
While trying to address the problem of illegal immigration, the Senate bill also aims to clear a backlog of more than 4 million foreigners around the world who have applied for family-based visas to be reunited with relatives in the United States.
But the proposal would also put more emphasis on “merit-based” work skills than on family ties over the ensuing years.
The bill proposes eliminating 70,000 green cards reserved for brothers, sisters and adult married children of U.S. residents, as well as a diversity lottery aimed at giving green cards to people selected at random from foreign countries each year.
On the flip side, the legislation would create an estimated 220,000 new green cards for people with exceptional work skills, including entertainers, scientists and professors.
Under current law, only about 14 percent of green cards are granted to people based on employment needs, but one Senate aide estimated that the percentage could eventually increase to 45 or 50 percent under the proposal.

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Les restrictions de visas privent les Etats-Unis d'entrepreneurs étrangers prometteurs

Le logo de l'entreprise Intel, dont le co-fondateur Andy Grove est d'origine hongroise.

Par Valentine Pasquesoone



Andy Grove d'Intel, Sergey Brin de Google, Pierre Omidyar d'eBay ou Jerry Yang de Yahoo! : ces fondateurs de quelques-unes des plus grandes sociétés américaines ont un point en commun : à l'instar de 41 % des dirigeants des 500 premières entreprises aux Etats-Unis, ils sont tous immigrés (pour 90 d'entre eux) ou enfants d'immigrés (pour 104 d'entre eux), selon une étude du Partnership for a New American Economy. Le célèbre fondateur d'Apple, Steve Jobs, est lui-même le fils d'un Syrien, résidant aujourd'hui au Nevada.
En février, lors d'un discours adressé aux salariés de l'entreprise Facebook, le président Barack Obama a affirmé que "nous voulons plus d'Andy Grove ici, aux Etats-Unis", faisant référence au succès du fondateur d'Intel, d'origine hongroise. "Nous ne voulons pas les voir lancer Intel en Chine, ou en France", a poursuivi le président américain. Malgré le succès rencontré par ces figures emblématiques de l'économie américaine, l'administration ne prévoit toujours aucun visa destiné aux entrepreneurs étrangers, a relevé, samedi 9 juin, le magazine britannique The Economist.

Quelques jours plus tôt, le projet Startup Act 2.0, prévoyant de créer une nouvelle catégorie de visas pour les entrepreneurs, a été introduit à la Chambre des représentants américaine. Mais jusqu'à présent, seul un visa investisseur, dont les frais de dossier s'élèvent à 1 500 dollars, est disponible. Il requiert du demandeur un investissement compris entre 500 000 et un million de dollars, et la garantie de créer au moins dix emplois à temps plein réservés aux citoyens américains.

POUR 100 IMMIGRES QUALIFIÉS, 44 EMPLOIS CRÉES

L'administration américaine rend ainsi difficile l'accès à un visa pour les jeunes entrepreneurs étrangers, dont la contribution à l'économie nationale est pourtant reconnue. L'étude "Immigration and American Jobs", menée en décembre 2011 par l'American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research et le Partnership for a New American Economy, montre ainsi que l'arrivée de 100 immigrés hautement qualifiés sur le territoire américain permet la création de 44 emplois pour les nationaux. Les travailleurs temporaires - qualifiés ou non - contribuent eux aussi à dynamiser l'économie, selon l'étude.

De 1995 à 2005, les entrepreneurs d'origine immigrée ont contribué à la formation du quart des sociétés de haute technologie aux Etats-Unis, créant au passage 450 000 emplois. L'étude du Partnership for a New American Economy, datant de juin 2011, montre que, parmi les 500 premières entreprises américaines, celles fondées par des immigrés ou des enfants d'immigrés emploient à elles seules 3,6 millions de personnes, "soit la population entière du Connecticut". Cumulés, leurs chiffres d'affaires dépassent le produit intérieur brut (PIB) de n'importe quel pays dans le monde, en dehors des Etats-Unis, de la Chine et du Japon.

Mais alors que 18 % de ces 500 plus grandes sociétés sont fondées par des migrants de première génération, le nombre de visas octroyés pour des raisons économiques chute aux Etats-Unis, contrairement à des pays comme le Canada ou l'Australie. Selon The Economist, les visas économiques représentaient, en 2011, 67 % des visas permanents délivrés au Canada, contre seulement 18 % en 1991. Aux Etats-Unis, cette part a à l'inverse reculé en vingt ans, les visas économiques ne représentant aujourd'hui que 13 % des visas permanents octroyés, contre 18 % en 1991.

DES ÉTATS-UNIS AU CHILI

Le magazine britannique évoque à ce sujet l'histoire de Claudio Carnino. Ce jeune entrepreneur italien, qui avait reçu l'accord d'investisseurs à Rhode Island, s'est vu refuser sa demande de visa par les services de l'immigration. Il est parti s'installer au Chili, où il dirige désormais une société aidant les entreprises à trouver de nouveaux clients sur Facebook. Le jeune homme a obtenu son visa en l'espace de deux semaines.

Au Chili, le système de visas pour les entrepreneurs est sans comparaison avec les règles américaines en vigueur. A travers le programme Start-Up Chile, des créateurs de start-ups étrangers sélectionnés reçoivent un visa temporaire d'un an, le temps de développer leur projet. Le gouvernement chilien leur offre également 40 000 dollars, sans demander de participation en retour.

L'Australie est aussi un pays attractif pour les entrepreneurs étrangers. Le nombre de visas pour travailleurs hautement qualifiés y est passé de 103 000 à 126 000 par année en cinq ans, selon The Economist. Soit l'équivalent du nombre de visas de travailleurs qualifiés délivrés par les Etats-Unis, mais pour une population quatorze fois moins importante.

INQUIÉTUDE DES ENTREPRISES

Face aux efforts menés par ces différents pays, les restrictions imposées par le système américain soulèvent des inquiétudes, notamment au regard de récents cas de refus. L'exemple d'Amit Aharoni, jeune Israélien diplômé de l'université de Stanford, est des plus révélateurs. Lui qui avait garanti un financement d'1,65 million de dollars pour son entreprise CruiseWise.com, et avait embauché neuf personnes en l'espace d'un an, s'est vu refuser sa demande de visa par les services de l'immigration américains en octobre dernier.

Contraint de quitter le pays pour le Canada, il a finalement réussi à revenir aux Etats-Unis grâce à un mouvement de soutien. Mais ce genre de situations inquiète les entreprises américaines, qui demandent une réforme du système de visas pour les travailleurs hautement qualifiés. En 2011, selon Reuters, la société Intel n'a pas pu faire muter 50 ingénieurs finlandais aux Etats-Unis.

En février, les services de l'immigration ont finalement tenu une conférence en ligne pour comprendre l'impact des politiques de l'immigration sur l'entrepreneuriat. L'un des participants, le chercheur de l'université de Duke Vivek Wadha, a déclaré à Reuters que la Silicon Valley, haut-lieu de l'innovation aux Etats-Unis, "saignait" du fait de ces restrictions. Selon lui, les règles actuelles empêchent les start-ups créées par des entrepreneurs étrangers de sponsoriser, c'est à dire financer, leurs visas.

De plus en plus d'immigrés hautement qualifiés quittent en effet le pays, préférant lancer leurs entreprises en Chine, ou Brésil ou en Inde. Vivek Wadha a d'ailleurs mené une étude à ce sujet, publiée en avril 2011. "L'innovation que l'on pourrait connaître ici a lieu à l'étranger", regrette-t-il dans un article publié par le site Venture Beat. "Sans nous en rendre compte, nous exportons notre prospérité, et renforçons nos concurrents."

Valentine Pasquesoone

Monday, April 16, 2012

More U.S. Children of Immigrants Are Leaving U.S.




Samir N. Kapadia seemed to be on the rise in Washington, moving from an internship on Capitol Hill to jobs at a major foundation and a consulting firm. Yet his days, he felt, had become routine.
By contrast, friends and relatives in India, his native country, were telling him about their lives in that newly surging nation. One was creating an e-commerce business, another a public relations company, still others a magazine, a business incubator and a gossip and events Web site.
“I’d sit there on Facebook and on the phone and hear about them starting all these companies and doing all these dynamic things,” recalled Mr. Kapadia, 25, who was born in India but grew up in the United States. “And I started feeling that my 9-to-5 wasn’t good enough anymore.”
Last year, he quit his job and moved to Mumbai.
In growing numbers, experts say, highly educated children of immigrants to the United States are uprooting themselves and moving to their ancestral countries. They are embracing homelands that their parents once spurned but that are now economic powers.
Some, like Mr. Kapadia, had arrived in the United States as young children, becoming citizens, while others were born in the United States to immigrant parents.
Enterprising Americans have always sought opportunities abroad. But this new wave underscores the evolving nature of global migration, and the challenges to American economic supremacy and competitiveness.
In interviews, many of these Americans said they did not know how long they would live abroad; some said it was possible that they would remain expatriates for many years, if not for the rest of their lives.
Their decisions to leave have, in many cases, troubled their immigrant parents. Yet most said they had been pushed by the dismal hiring climate in the United States or pulled by prospects abroad.
“Markets are opening; people are coming up with ideas every day; there’s so much opportunity to mold and create,” said Mr. Kapadia, now a researcher at Gateway House, a new foreign-policy research organization in Mumbai. “People here are running much faster than the people in Washington.”
For generations, the world’s less-developed countries have suffered so-called brain drain — the flight of many of their best and brightest to the West. That has not stopped, but now a reverse flow has begun, particularly to countries like China and India and, to a lesser extent, Brazil and Russia.
Some scholars and business leaders contend that this emigration does not necessarily bode ill for the United States. They say young entrepreneurs and highly educated professionals sow American knowledge and skills abroad. At the same time, these workers acquire experience overseas and build networks that they can carry back to the United States or elsewhere — a pattern known as “brain circulation.”
But the experts caution that in the global race for talent, the return of these expatriates to the United States and American companies is no longer a sure bet.
“These are the fleet-footed; they’re the ones who in a sense will follow opportunity,” said Demetrios G. Papademetriou, president of the Migration Policy Institute, a nonprofit group in Washington that studies population movements.
“I know there will be people who will argue all about loyalty, et cetera, et cetera,” he said. “I know when you go to war, loyalty matters. But this is a different kind of war that affects all of us.”
The United States government does not collect data specifically on the emigration of the American-born children of immigrants — or on those who were born abroad but moved to the United States as young children.
But several migration experts said the phenomenon was significant and increasing.
“We’ve gone way beyond anecdotal evidence,” said Edward J. W. Park, director of the Asian Pacific American Studies Program at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.
Mr. Park said this migration was spurred by the efforts of some overseas governments to attract more foreign talent by offering employment, investment, tax and visa incentives.
“So it’s not just the individuals who are making these decisions,” he said. “It’s governments who enact strategic policies to facilitate this.”
Officials in India said they had seen a sharp increase in the arrival of people of Indian descent in recent years — including at least 100,000 in 2010 alone, said Alwyn Didar Singh, a former senior official at the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs.
Many of these Americans have been able to leverage family networks, language skills and cultural knowledge gleaned from growing up in immigrant households.
Jonathan Assayag, 29, a Brazilian-American born in Rio de Janeiro and raised in South Florida, returned to Brazil last year. A Harvard Business School graduate, he had been working at an Internet company in Silicon Valley and unsuccessfully trying to develop a business.
“I spent five months spending my weekends at Starbucks, trying to figure out a start-up in America,” he recalled.
All the while, Harvard friends urged him to make a change. “They were saying: ‘Jon, what are you doing? Go to Brazil and start a business there!’ ” he said.
Relocating to São Paulo, he became an “entrepreneur in residence” at a venture capital firm. He is starting an online eyewear business. “I speak the language, I get the culture, I understand how people do business,” he said.
Calvin Chin was born in Michigan and used to live in San Francisco, where he worked at technology start-ups and his wife was an interior decorator. Mr. Chin’s mother was from China, as were his paternal grandparents. His wife’s parents were from Taiwan.
They are now in Shanghai, where Mr. Chin has started two companies — an online loan service for students and an incubator for technology start-ups. His wife, Angie Wu, has worked as a columnist and television anchor.
“The energy here is phenomenal,” Mr. Chin said.
The couple have two children, who were born in China.
Reetu Jain, 36, an Indian-American raised in Texas, was inspired to move to India while taking time off from her auditing job to travel abroad. Everywhere she went, she said, she met people returning to their countries of origin and feeling the “creative energy” in the developing world.
She and her husband, Nehal Sanghavi, who had been working as a lawyer in the United States, moved to Mumbai in January 2011. Embracing a long-held passion, she now works as a dance instructor and choreographer and has acted in television commercials and a Bollywood film.
“We’re surrounded by people who just want to try something new,” Ms. Jain said.
For many of these émigrés, the decision to relocate has confounded — and even angered — their immigrant parents.
When Jason Y. Lee, who was born in Taiwan and raised in the United States, told his parents during college that he wanted to visit Hong Kong, his father refused to pay for the plane ticket.
“His mind-set was, ‘I worked so hard to bring you to America and now you want to go back to China?’ ” recalled Mr. Lee, 29.
Since then, Mr. Lee has started an import-export business between the United States and China; studied in Shanghai; worked for investment banks in New York and Singapore; and created an international job-search Web site in India. He works for an investment firm in Singapore. His father’s opposition has softened.
Margareth Tran — whose family followed a path over two generations from China to the United States by way of Cambodia, Thailand, Hong Kong and France — said her father was displeased by her decision in 2009 to relocate.
“It’s kind of crazy for him that I wanted to move to China,” said Ms. Tran, 26, who was born in France and moved to the United States at age 11. “He wants me to have all the benefits that come from a first-world country.”
But after graduating from Cornell University in 2009 at the height of the recession, she could not find work on Wall Street, a long-held ambition. She moved to Shanghai and found a job at a management consulting firm.
“I had never stepped foot in Asia, so part of the reason was to go back to my roots,” she said.
Ms. Tran said she did not know how long she would remain abroad. She said she was open to various possibilities, including moving to another foreign country, living a life straddling China and the United States or remaining permanently in China.
Her father has reluctantly accepted her approach.
“I told him, ‘I’m going to try to make it in China, and if things work out for me in China, then I can have a really great career,’ ” she said. “He didn’t hold me back.”



Saturday, June 27, 2009

Working Together for Immigration Reform

THU, JUNE 25, 7:45 PM EST


Posted by Katherine Brandon



read the transcript

The President and Vice President met with a bipartisan group of Congressional leaders today to discuss one of today's most contentious issues – immigration – and how to go about reforming the broken immigration system. The President stated that the Administration is fully behind comprehensive immigration reform, and that they will be working with House and Senate leaders to have an honest conversation about the issues and come up with practical solutions:
We have members of Congress from both chambers, from parties, who have participated in the meeting and shared a range of ideas. I think the consensus is that despite our inability to get this passed over the last several years, the American people still want to see a solution in which we are tightening up our borders, or cracking down on employers who are using illegal workers in order to drive down wages -- and oftentimes mistreat those workers. And we need a effective way to recognize and legalize the status of undocumented workers who are here.
While Congressional leaders are working to tackle the complexities of immigration reform, the Administration has already taken steps to improve the system. The FBI has cleared much of the backlog of immigration background checks, the Department of Homeland Security is speeding up citizenship petitions and in conjunction with the Department of Labor, they are working to crack down on employers who are exploiting illegal workers. The President also announced a new collaborative effort that will utilize technology to improve legal immigration:
Today I'm pleased to announce a new collaboration between my Chief Information Officer, my Chief Performance Officer, my Chief Technologies Officer and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Office to make the agency much more efficient, much more transparent, much more user-friendly than it has been in the past.
In the next 90 days, USCIS will launch a vastly improved Web site that will, for the first time ever, allow applicants to get updates on their status of their applications via e-mail and text message and online. And anybody who's dealt with families who are trying to deal with -- navigate the immigration system, this is going to save them huge amounts of time standing in line, waiting around, making phone calls, being put on hold. It's an example of some things that we can do administratively even as we're working through difficult issues surrounding comprehensive immigration.
And the idea is very simple here: We're going to leverage cutting-edge technology to reduce the unnecessary paperwork, backlogs, and the lack of transparency that's caused so many people so much heartache.
Immigration meeting
(President Barack Obama talks with members of Congress to discuss immigration, Thursday, June 25, 2009,
in the State Dinning Room of the White House. From left; Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, Rep. Luis Guitierrez,
D-Ill., Rep. Nydia Velazquez, D-N.Y., Rep. James Clyburn, D - S.C. the president, Vice President Joe Biden,
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)


Wikio

FAITES UN DON SI VOUS AIMEZ LE CONTENU DE CE BLOGUE